From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walls v. Attorney General of State

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 26, 2007
Civil Action No. 06-1598 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 26, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-1598.

November 26, 2007


ORDER


AND NOW, this 26th day of November, 2007, after the Petitioner, Robert E. Walls, filed an action in the above-captioned case, and after a Report and Recommendation was filed by the United States Magistrate Judge granting the parties ten days after being served with a copy to file written objections thereto, and no objections having been filed, and upon independent review of the record, and upon consideration of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which is adopted as the opinion of this Court,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability be denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, if the parties desire to appeal from this Order they must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a notice of appeal as provided in Rule 3, Fed.R.App.P.


Summaries of

Walls v. Attorney General of State

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 26, 2007
Civil Action No. 06-1598 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 26, 2007)
Case details for

Walls v. Attorney General of State

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT E. WALLS, Petitioner v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 26, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-1598 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 26, 2007)

Citing Cases

Wright v. Mahally

Indeed, courts have routinely rejected precisely this suggestion, and the suggestions by state prisoners that…

Wilkinson v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation Parole

Thus, federal courts have routinely rejected suggestions by state prisoners that discretionary parole denials…