From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wallis v. Maddox

Supreme Court of Georgia
Sep 21, 1967
157 S.E.2d 456 (Ga. 1967)

Opinion

24304.

SUBMITTED SEPTEMBER 14, 1967.

DECIDED SEPTEMBER 21, 1967.

Injunction. Fulton Superior Court. Before Judge Dyer.

C. C. Perkins, for appellants.

Jones, Bird Howell, Peyton S. Hawes, Jr., Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, Harold N. Hill, Alfred L. Evans, Assistant Attorneys General, Arthur Howell, Tisinger Tisinger, R. D. Tisinger, for appellees.


Under the decision in Hicks v. Maple Valley Corp., 223 Ga. 577, the judgment of the trial court must be affirmed since the appellants' brief failed to point out the places in the record showing this court to have jurisdiction of the appeal, the references to the record showing the errors specified, or the references necessary for a consideration thereof.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

SUBMITTED SEPTEMBER 14, 1967 — DECIDED SEPTEMBER 21, 1967.


Summaries of

Wallis v. Maddox

Supreme Court of Georgia
Sep 21, 1967
157 S.E.2d 456 (Ga. 1967)
Case details for

Wallis v. Maddox

Case Details

Full title:WALLIS et al. v. MADDOX, Chairman, et al

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: Sep 21, 1967

Citations

157 S.E.2d 456 (Ga. 1967)
223 Ga. 626

Citing Cases

Law v. Smith

Accordingly, upon the authority of Hicks v. Maple Valley Corp., 223 Ga. 577 ( 156 S.E.2d 904), none of the…

Clark v. Perrin

There being a complete failure to comply with the requirements of Rule 16 of the Rules of the Supreme Court,…