From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wall v. Ches. Ohio Ry. Co.

U.S.
Apr 11, 1921
256 U.S. 125 (1921)

Opinion

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS.

No. 237.

Argued March 21, 1921. Decided April 11, 1921.

A federal question which could have been raised before but was first raised in the state Supreme Court by a petition for rehearing, which that court merely overruled, does not confer jurisdiction on this court. Writ of error to review 290 Ill. 227, dismissed.

THE case is stated in the opinion.

Mr. C. Paul Tallmadge, with whom Mr. Almon W. Bulkley and Mr. Clair E. More were on the brief, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Worth E. Caylor for defendant in error.


An Illinois statute of 1903 amended the Act of 1853 which gave a right of action for wrongful death by adding thereto — " Provided further, that no action shall be brought or prosecuted in this State, to recover damages for a death occurring outside of this State." Our jurisdiction is invoked upon the theory that validity of the amending act was challenged below because of conflict with the Federal Constitution. But the point was not raised prior to the petition to the Supreme Court for a rehearing which was overruled without more. 290 Ill. 227. It could have been presented earlier. According to the well established rule we may not now consider it; and the writ of error must be dismissed. Godchaux Co. v. Estopinal, 251 U.S. 179.

Dismissed.


Summaries of

Wall v. Ches. Ohio Ry. Co.

U.S.
Apr 11, 1921
256 U.S. 125 (1921)
Case details for

Wall v. Ches. Ohio Ry. Co.

Case Details

Full title:WALL, ADMINISTRATRIX OF WALL, v . CHESAPEAKE OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY

Court:U.S.

Date published: Apr 11, 1921

Citations

256 U.S. 125 (1921)

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Cook

The purpose of this requirement is to restrict our mandatory jurisdiction on appeal, Memphis Gas Co. v.…

Romero v. People of Puerto Rico

In the per curiam of the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico on appeal, the only federal question considered was a…