From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. University of Texas Medical Branch

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division
Oct 30, 2008
NO. 1:08-CV-417 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 30, 2008)

Opinion

NO. 1:08-CV-417.

October 30, 2008


ORDER


The court referred this matter to the Honorable Earl S. Hines, United States magistrate judge, for pretrial proceedings pursuant to General Order 05-07 on July 31, 2008. The court has received and considered the report of the United States magistrate judge, who recommends that the court deny plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. No objections to the report and recommendation have been filed. Further, the court's independent review confirms that the magistrate judge's analysis is correct.

Accordingly, the magistrate judge's report is hereby ADOPTED. It is further

ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket No. 2) is DENIED. It is further

ORDERED that plaintiff shall tender the fee established by law for filing a civil action ($350.00) on or before December 10, 2008. If the filing fee is not tendered to the Clerk of Court within the extended time established, this action may be dismissed.

So ORDERED and SIGNED.


Summaries of

Walker v. University of Texas Medical Branch

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division
Oct 30, 2008
NO. 1:08-CV-417 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 30, 2008)
Case details for

Walker v. University of Texas Medical Branch

Case Details

Full title:FREDDIE L. WALKER, SR., d/b/a Walker's Empire Professional Janitorial…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division

Date published: Oct 30, 2008

Citations

NO. 1:08-CV-417 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 30, 2008)

Citing Cases

Williams v. United States

See, e.g., Mann v. City of Moss Point, 2014 WL 4794544 (S.D.Miss. Sept. 25, 2014); Bruton v. Colvin, 2014 WL…

Williams v. Louisiana

Typically, a district court must inquire as to whether the costs of an appeal would cause an undue financial…