From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov 17, 2021
328 So. 3d 392 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 1D21-2240

11-17-2021

Reginald A. WALKER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Reginald A. Walker, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Reginald A. Walker, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam. Upon consideration of Petitioner's response docketed September 23, 2021, the Court dismisses the petition for writ of mandamus. See Logan v. State , 846 So. 2d 472 (Fla. 2003) (holding that, generally, a defendant has no right to represent himself in an extraordinary writ petition in the appellate court while he is represented by counsel in the criminal case pending in the lower tribunal); Marsh v. State , 919 So. 2d 540 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (finding a pro se petition for writ of mandamus a nullity where petitioner was represented by counsel in the trial court in an involuntary civil commitment proceeding).

Roberts, Winokur, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Walker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Nov 17, 2021
328 So. 3d 392 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Walker v. State

Case Details

Full title:Reginald A. WALKER, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Nov 17, 2021

Citations

328 So. 3d 392 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)