From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Feb 1, 2021
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:20-cv-00196 (S.D.W. Va. Feb. 1, 2021)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:20-cv-00196

02-01-2021

ROBERT KENNETH WALKER, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

By Standing Order (Document 3) entered on March 20, 2020, this action was referred to the Honorable Cheryl A. Eifert, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B).

On January 6, 2021, the Magistrate Judge submitted a Proposed Findings and Recommendation (Document 17) wherein it is recommended that this Court deny the Plaintiff's brief/motion for judgment on the pleadings, grant the Defendant's brief/motion for judgment on the pleadings, affirm the final decision of the Commissioner, and dismiss this action from the Court's docket.

Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommendation were due by January 20, 2021, and none were filed by either party. The Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the findings or recommendation to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985); see also Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983) (holding that districts courts may adopt proposed findings and recommendations without explanation in the absence of objections).

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as contained in the Proposed Findings and Recommendation, and ORDERS that the Plaintiff's brief/motion for judgment on the pleadings (Document 15) be DENIED and that the Defendant's brief/motion for judgment on the pleadings (Document 16) be GRANTED. The Court further ORDERS that the final decision of the Commissioner be AFFIRMED and that this action be DISMISSED from the Court's docket.

The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a certified copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to Magistrate Judge Eifert, counsel of record, and any unrepresented party.

ENTER: February 1, 2021

/s/_________

IRENE C. BERGER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA


Summaries of

Walker v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Feb 1, 2021
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:20-cv-00196 (S.D.W. Va. Feb. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Walker v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT KENNETH WALKER, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION

Date published: Feb 1, 2021

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:20-cv-00196 (S.D.W. Va. Feb. 1, 2021)

Citing Cases

Prudich v. Saul

Importantly, however, "there is a stark difference between an ALJ not explicitly mentioning every scintilla…

Jesse v. Kijakazi

Importantly, however, “there is a stark difference between an ALJ not explicitly mentioning every scintilla…