From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. Danforth

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION
Aug 18, 2011
CASE NO. 7:11-CV-71 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Aug. 18, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 7:11-CV-71 (HL)

08-18-2011

PATRICK WALKER, Plaintiff v. WILLIAM DANFORTH, et al, Defendants


ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. 9) filed July 11, 2011 has been read and considered and is, hereby, approved, adopted and made the Order of the Court.

The Objection of the plaintiff to the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (Doc. 14) filed July 25, 2011 has also been read and thoroughly considered and is found to be without merit.

HUGH LAWSON , Senior Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Walker v. Danforth

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION
Aug 18, 2011
CASE NO. 7:11-CV-71 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Aug. 18, 2011)
Case details for

Walker v. Danforth

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK WALKER, Plaintiff v. WILLIAM DANFORTH, et al, Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION

Date published: Aug 18, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 7:11-CV-71 (HL) (M.D. Ga. Aug. 18, 2011)

Citing Cases

Soper v. Tyler

Atwood v. Cobb, 16 Pick. 227, Shaw, C. J.; Cocker v. Franklin, etc., Mfg. Co., 3 Sum. 530, Story, J. If the…

Richardson v. Davis

[1] Appellant rests his case on the well-accepted rule that a party to a contract has the power to stop…