From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION
Sep 13, 2012
CV 112-105 (S.D. Ga. Sep. 13, 2012)

Opinion

CV 112-105

09-13-2012

PATRICK WALKER, Plaintiff, v. DENNIS BROWN, Warden, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Therefore, the Plaintiff's motion for class certification is DENIED. (Doc. no. 3.)

SO ORDERED this 13 day of September, 2012, at Augusta, Georgia.

______________________

HONORABLE J. RANDAL HALL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA


Summaries of

Walker v. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION
Sep 13, 2012
CV 112-105 (S.D. Ga. Sep. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Walker v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK WALKER, Plaintiff, v. DENNIS BROWN, Warden, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA AUGUSTA DIVISION

Date published: Sep 13, 2012

Citations

CV 112-105 (S.D. Ga. Sep. 13, 2012)

Citing Cases

Hoke v. Lyte

Simply put, incarcerated pro se litigants may not bring a class action on behalf of other prisoners. See…