From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BECKLEY DIVISION
Mar 12, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:12-cv-00566 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 12, 2013)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:12-cv-00566

03-12-2013

JOSEPH FREEMAN WALKER, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

By Standing Order (Document 4) entered on February 27, 2012, this action was referred to the Honorable R. Clarke VanDervort, United States Magistrate Judge, for submission to this Court of proposed findings of fact and recommendation for disposition, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On February 22, 2013, the Magistrate Judge submitted his Proposed Findings and Recommendation (Document 15), wherein it is recommended that this Court grant the Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings, deny the Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings, reverse the final decision of the Commission, remand the matter for further proceedings, and dismiss the matter from the Court's docket. Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommendation were due by March 11, 2013.

Neither party has timely filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommendation. The Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the findings or recommendation to which no objections are addressed. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985); see also Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199 (4th Cir. 1983) (holding that districts courts may adopt proposed findings and recommendations without explanation in the absence of objections).

Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS and incorporates herein the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as contained in the Proposed Findings and Recommendation. The Court ORDERS that the Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Document 12) be GRANTED and that the Defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Document 13) be DENIED. Further, the Court ORDERS that the final decision of the Commissioner be REVERSED and that this case be REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the Magistrate Judge's Proposed Findings and Recommendation. Lastly the Court ORDERS that this action be DISMISSED from the Court's docket.

The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a certified copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to Magistrate Judge VanDervort, to counsel of record, and to any unrepresented party.

_________________

IRENE C. BERGER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA


Summaries of

Walker v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BECKLEY DIVISION
Mar 12, 2013
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:12-cv-00566 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 12, 2013)
Case details for

Walker v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH FREEMAN WALKER, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA BECKLEY DIVISION

Date published: Mar 12, 2013

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:12-cv-00566 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 12, 2013)

Citing Cases

Prophet v. Saul

District courts within the Fourth Circuit have found that the failure to comply with the two-step pain…

Greene v. Kijakazi

Accordingly, other courts “within the Fourth Circuit have found that the failure to comply with the [Craig]…