From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Waldrop v. Department of Corrections

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 11, 2006
No. CIV S-06-1260 DFL EFB P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2006)

Summary

dismissing parolee's claim that CDCR had placed radio transmitters in his ears and uses satellite to monitor him

Summary of this case from Vargas v. Gonzales

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-1260 DFL EFB P.

October 11, 2006


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On August 8, 2006, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 8, 2006, are adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff's July 28, 2006, request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied; and

3. This action is dismissed.


Summaries of

Waldrop v. Department of Corrections

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 11, 2006
No. CIV S-06-1260 DFL EFB P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2006)

dismissing parolee's claim that CDCR had placed radio transmitters in his ears and uses satellite to monitor him

Summary of this case from Vargas v. Gonzales

dismissing as frivolous claims that prison placed radio transmitters in plaintiff's ears and used satellite transmissions to monitor him as an experiment for a web site because they "describ[ed] fantastic or delusional scenarios."

Summary of this case from Meyer v. World Bank

dismissing as frivolous claims that prison placed radio transmitters in plaintiff's ears and used satellite transmissions to monitor him as an experiment for a web site because they "describ[ed] fantastic or delusional scenarios."

Summary of this case from Martin v. Trump
Case details for

Waldrop v. Department of Corrections

Case Details

Full title:FRED WALDROP, Plaintiff, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 11, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-06-1260 DFL EFB P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2006)

Citing Cases

Vargas v. Gonzales

See, e.g., Vargas v. Gonalzes, No. 2:20-cv-00667-CJC (SK) (C.D. Cal. March 3, 2020) (dismissing Plaintiff's…

Meyer v. World Bank

Therefore, Plaintiff's Complaint requires sua sponte dismissal as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §…