From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Waldron v. La Guardia Medical Group

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 11, 1985
109 A.D.2d 792 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

March 11, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Young, J.).


Order reversed, insofar as appealed from, as a matter of discretion, without costs or disbursements, and, upon renewal, order dated June 24, 1983 vacated, plaintiffs' motion for leave to enter a default judgment denied, and that branch of appellants' motion which sought vacatur of their default granted, on condition that each appellant pays plaintiffs $2,000 within 30 days after service upon him of a copy of the order to be made hereon, with notice of entry. In the event either appellant fails to comply with this condition, then order affirmed as to that appellant, with costs.

Despite its ostensible denial of appellants' motion to "renew and/or reargue", the subsequent language of its order indicates that Special Term did in fact consider appellants' and their counsel's newly submitted affidavits dated July 26, 1983. Thus, Special Term must be deemed to have exercised its discretion to grant renewal ( Esa v. New York Prop. Ins. Underwriting Assn., 89 A.D.2d 865).

Upon renewal, Special Term adhered to its original determination refusing to vacate the default judgment. Under the totality of the circumstances here presented, the interest of justice is better served by vacating this inadvertent default and allowing appellants their day in court. The condition imposed should redress plaintiffs for any inconvenience suffered. Mollen, P.J., Titone, Lazer and Thompson, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Waldron v. La Guardia Medical Group

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 11, 1985
109 A.D.2d 792 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Waldron v. La Guardia Medical Group

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK WALDRON et al., Respondents, v. LA GUARDIA MEDICAL GROUP et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 11, 1985

Citations

109 A.D.2d 792 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Matter of Zaremba v. Interface Flooring Sys

Despite its ostensible denial of the employer's motion for "renewal and/or reargument", the subsequent…

Matter of Harley v. Assessor of the Town

Respondents' conduct throughout the course of the proceedings clearly establishes that they never intended to…