From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wal-Mart Stores v. Dukes

U.S.
Dec 6, 2010
562 U.S. 1091 (2010)

Summary

granting certiorari on class certification question

Summary of this case from Connor B. v. Patrick

Opinion

No. 10–277.

12-06-2010

WAL–MART STORES, INC., petitioner, v. Betty DUKES, et al.


Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted limited to Question I presented by the petition. In addition to Question I, the parties are directed to brief and argue the following question: "Whether the class certification ordered under Rule 23(b)(2) was consistent with Rule 23(a)."


Summaries of

Wal-Mart Stores v. Dukes

U.S.
Dec 6, 2010
562 U.S. 1091 (2010)

granting certiorari on class certification question

Summary of this case from Connor B. v. Patrick
Case details for

Wal-Mart Stores v. Dukes

Case Details

Full title:WAL-MART STORES, INC. v. BETTY DUKES, ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Dec 6, 2010

Citations

562 U.S. 1091 (2010)
131 S. Ct. 795
178 L. Ed. 2d 530

Citing Cases

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes

We granted certiorari. 562 U.S. ––––, 131 S.Ct. 795, 178 L.Ed.2d 530 (2010).…

Tech v. United States

In the event the Plaintiff can craft a sufficiently identifiable class under the dictates of Rule 23, he is…