From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wake Cnty. Human Servs. v. Davis

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 25, 2013
530 F. App'x 272 (4th Cir. 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-1066

06-25-2013

WAKE COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, II, Defendants - Appellant.

William Scott Davis, II, Appellant Pro Se.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:12-cv-00413-BO) Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed in part and affirmed in part by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Scott Davis, II, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

William Scott Davis, Jr., appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and remanding his case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. An order remanding a case to state court is generally not reviewable on appeal or otherwise. 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) (2006). The Supreme Court has limited § 1447(d) to insulate from appellate review those remand orders based on the grounds specified in § 1447(c): a defect in the removal procedure or a lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Quackenbush v. Allstate Ins. Co., 517 U.S. 706, 711-12 (1996). In this case, the district court remanded the case because it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the proceeding. Moreover, this case does not implicate § 1443. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.

Davis also appeals the district court's orders denying his motion to stay the magistrate judge's memorandum and recommendation, motion to appoint counsel, and motion for extension of time to file additional pleadings. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wake Cnty. Human Servs. v. Davis, No. 5:12-cv-00413-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 9, 2013; Apr. 22, 2013). We deny Davis' motions to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED IN PART;

AFFIRMED IN PART


Summaries of

Wake Cnty. Human Servs. v. Davis

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jun 25, 2013
530 F. App'x 272 (4th Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Wake Cnty. Human Servs. v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:WAKE COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jun 25, 2013

Citations

530 F. App'x 272 (4th Cir. 2013)

Citing Cases

Wake Cnty. Human Servs. v. Davis

This court has dismissed Davis' appeal of the order of remand. Wake Cnty. Human Servs. v. Davis, No. 13-1066,…

Suntrust Mortg., Inc. v. Thomas

Courts regularly remand removal cases at the required initial review of in forma pauperis applications based…