From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wahl v. Seyfried

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 20, 1940
260 App. Div. 993 (N.Y. App. Div. 1940)

Opinion

November 20, 1940.

Present — Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.


Judgment affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. All concur, except Taylor and Dowling, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and facts and for dismissal of the complaint on the ground that the findings that the contract alleged in the complaint was made are contrary to and against the weight of the evidence. (See Tracy v. Danzinger, 253 App. Div. 418; affd., 279 N.Y. 679.) (The judgment is for plaintiffs in an action to compel specific performance of an agreement.)


Summaries of

Wahl v. Seyfried

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 20, 1940
260 App. Div. 993 (N.Y. App. Div. 1940)
Case details for

Wahl v. Seyfried

Case Details

Full title:BERTHA WAHL and JOSEPH M. SEYFRIED, Respondents, v. MARY SEYFRIED and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 20, 1940

Citations

260 App. Div. 993 (N.Y. App. Div. 1940)