From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wadsworth v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Apr 11, 2018
No. 73164 (Nev. App. Apr. 11, 2018)

Opinion

No. 73164

04-11-2018

MICHAEL BENARD WADSWORTH, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

Michael Benard Wadsworth appeals from an order of the district court denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed on May 31, 2016, and supplemental petition filed on August 29, 2016. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Connie J. Steinheimer, Judge.

Wadsworth filed his petition nearly eight years after issuance of the remittitur on direct appeal on July 1, 2008. See Wadsworth v. State, Docket No. 48071 (Order of Affirmance, June 4, 2008). Wadsworth's petition was therefore untimely filed. See NRS 34.726(1). Wadsworth's petition was also successive and an abuse of the writ. NRS 34.810(1)(b)(2); NRS 34.810(2). Wadsworth's petition was therefore procedurally barred absent a demonstration of good cause and actual prejudice. See NRS 34.726(1); NRS 34.810(1)(b); NRS 34.810(3).

See Wadsworth v. Warden, Docket No. 58811 (Order of Affirmance, November 15, 2012).

Wadsworth contends the failures of trial, appellate, and postconviction counsel to recognize that a jury instruction contained an incorrect statement of law constitute good cause to excuse his procedural bars. Claims of ineffective assistance of trial or appellate counsel cannot be good cause where, as here, they are procedurally barred. See Hathaway v. State, 119 Nev. 248, 252, 71 P.3d 503, 506 (2003) ("[I]n order to constitute adequate cause, the ineffective assistance of counsel claim itself must not be procedurally defaulted."). And the ineffective assistance of postconviction counsel cannot be good cause where, as here, the appointment of counsel was not statutorily or constitutionally required. See Brown v. McDaniel, 130 Nev. 565, 571, 331 P.3d 867, 871-72 (2014). We therefore conclude the district court did not err in denying Wadsworth's petition as procedurally barred, and we

Even assuming we had authority to entertain Wadsworth's request that we revisit or overrule Brown, we conclude he has failed to demonstrate any basis for doing so. --------

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

/s/_________, C.J.

Silver

/s/_________, J.

Tao

/s/_________, J.

Gibbons cc: Hon. Connie J. Steinheimer, District Judge

Troy Curtis Jordan

Attorney General/Carson City

Washoe County District Attorney

Washoe District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Wadsworth v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Apr 11, 2018
No. 73164 (Nev. App. Apr. 11, 2018)
Case details for

Wadsworth v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL BENARD WADSWORTH, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Apr 11, 2018

Citations

No. 73164 (Nev. App. Apr. 11, 2018)