From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

WADA v. TOMLINSON

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Dec 5, 2008
296 F. App'x 77 (D.C. Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-5198.

September 15, 2008. Rehearing En Banc Denied December 5, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 03cv01488).

Hadiza I. Wada, Bowie, MD, pro se.

R. Craig Lawrence, Rhonda C. Fields, Michael Joseph Ryan, Jeffrey Allen Taylor, U.S. Attorney's Office, Washington, DC, for Appellee.

Before: SENTELLE, Chief Judge, and HENDERSON, Circuit Judge, and WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge.


JUDGMENT

This case was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. The Court has determined that the issues presented occasion no need for oral argument. See D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the judgment of the district court be affirmed. The appellant has not identified any errors in the district court's decision.

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed.R.App.P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.


Summaries of

WADA v. TOMLINSON

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Dec 5, 2008
296 F. App'x 77 (D.C. Cir. 2008)
Case details for

WADA v. TOMLINSON

Case Details

Full title:Hadiza I. WADA, Appellant v. Kenneth Y. TOMLINSON, Appellee

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Dec 5, 2008

Citations

296 F. App'x 77 (D.C. Cir. 2008)

Citing Cases

Yaich v. Walsh

” Wada v. Tomlinson, 517 F.Supp.2d 148, 183 (D.D.C. 2007) (citing Morgan, 536 U.S. at 122), aff'd 296…

Slate v. Pub. Defender Serv. for D.C.

Wada v. Tomlinson, 517 F.Supp.2d 148, 183 (D.D.C.2007) (“[A]s the Supreme Court's seminal decision in [Morgan…