From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vrenna v. Tunis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 19, 1996
226 A.D.2d 1130 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

April 19, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Erie County, Notaro, J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Pine, Fallon, Balio and Boehm, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in denying defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages for personal injuries he sustained when a window in the room he rented from defendant fell on his hand. Defendant moved for summary judgment upon the ground that she had no actual or constructive notice of the defective condition of the window. "In order for a landlord to be held liable for a defective condition upon the premises, [she] must have actual or constructive notice of the condition for such a period of time that, in the exercise of reasonable care, [she] should have corrected it" ( Appleby v Webb, 186 A.D.2d 1078, citing Putnam v. Stout, 38 N.Y.2d 607, 612). Defendant submitted evidentiary proof in admissible form establishing that she had no such notice. Plaintiff's opposition to the motion failed to raise any material issue of fact requiring a trial.


Summaries of

Vrenna v. Tunis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 19, 1996
226 A.D.2d 1130 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Vrenna v. Tunis

Case Details

Full title:JOHN C. VRENNA, Respondent, v. KATHERINE TUNIS, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 19, 1996

Citations

226 A.D.2d 1130 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
642 N.Y.S.2d 129

Citing Cases

Rotondi v. Drewes

017, affd 11 NY2d 936, 318 NYS2d 313). Contrary to plaintiffs contention, it cannot be concluded, as a matter…

Pulley v. McNeal

Nor was there any proof as to how long the alleged defect had existed. Given this, summary judgment was…