From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Voyles v. Voyles

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Nov 23, 1992
842 S.W.2d 21 (Ark. 1992)

Opinion

92-1148

Opinion delivered November 23, 1992

1. APPEAL ERROR — WHEN FINAL ORDER ENTERED. — Ark. R. App. P. 4(e) provides that a final order is entered within the meaning of the rule when it is filed with the clerk of the court in which the claim was tried. 2. APPEAL ERROR — CRITICAL FACTOR — WHEN ORDER ENTERED, NOT WHEN IT IS SIGNED. — The critical factor in deciding whether a tendered transcript should be accepted or denied on appeal as timely is whether the order extending the time to file the transcript was entered within the ninety-day period, not whether the order was signed within the ninety-day period. 3. APPEAL ERROR — ORDER ENTERED WHEN FILED WITH CLERK — NO CONFLICT WITH ARK. R. CIV. P. 5(d) PROVIDING FOR FILING WITH JUDGE. — An order cannot be deemed entered, or filed with the clerk, just because it is signed by the judge and it contains a recitation that it is filed, when in fact it is not filed with the clerk.

Motion for Rule on the Clerk; denied.

Mike J. Etoch, for appellant.

Fletcher Long, for appellee.


In this civil case, the appellant's tender of the transcript was denied by our clerk because the order extending the time to file the transcript was not entered within the ninety-day period. See Ark. R. App. P. 5(b).

The trial court signed the order within the ninety-day period, but it was not entered within that period. Rule 4(e) of the Arkansas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides that a final "order is entered within the meaning of this rule when it is filed with the clerk of the court in which the claim was tried." (Emphasis supplied.)

We explained in Finley v. State, 281 Ark. 38, 661 S.W.2d 358 (1983) and Sullivan v. Wickliffe, 284 Ark. 33, 678 S.W.2d 771 (1984), that the critical factor in this type of case is when the order is entered, not when it is signed.

In this case the order was timely signed and filed with the judge, but not with the clerk of the court. A question has been raised about a possible conflict of the above quoted rule of appellate procedure with one of our rules of civil procedure. Ark. R. Civ. P. 5(d) provides:

Filing with the Judge. The judge may permit papers or pleadings to be filed with him, in which event he shall note thereon the filing date and forthwith transmit them to the office of the clerk.

We addressed this issue in Sullivan v. Wickliffe, supra, and explained that an order cannot be deemed entered, or filed with the clerk, just because it is signed by the judge and it contains a recitation that it is filed, when in fact it is not filed with the clerk. If our rules were otherwise, the prevailing party could not discover by public record whether the case was ended.

Motion for a rule on the clerk is denied.


Summaries of

Voyles v. Voyles

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Nov 23, 1992
842 S.W.2d 21 (Ark. 1992)
Case details for

Voyles v. Voyles

Case Details

Full title:Shelly VOYLES v. Danny VOYLES

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Nov 23, 1992

Citations

842 S.W.2d 21 (Ark. 1992)
842 S.W.2d 21

Citing Cases

Waddle v. Sargent

To the contrary, all the authority I have found indicates the signing of the judgment is not a jurisdictional…

King v. King

Likewise, it is the attorney's responsibility to ensure that the order granting an extension of time to file…