From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vo v. CEREF REO II

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Sep 15, 2011
373 P.3d 971 (Nev. 2011)

Opinion

No. 57423.

09-15-2011

Tammy VO, Appellant, v. CEREF REO II, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, Respondent.

William G. Cobb, Settlement Judge Rick Lawton Shea & Carlyon, Ltd.


William G. Cobb, Settlement Judge

Rick Lawton

Shea & Carlyon, Ltd.

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is an appeal from a district court order denying a petition for a writ of prohibition or mandamus. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Steven P. Elliott, Judge.

Having reviewed the parties' briefs and the record on appeal, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant's petition for a writ of prohibition or mandamus. Reno Newspapers v. Sheriff. 126 Nev. ––––, ––––, 234 P.3d 922, 924 (2010) (stating that a district court denial of a writ petition is reviewed for an abuse of discretion). Appellant has failed to demonstrate why she did not have a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law in the form of an appeal from the justice court judgment, see JCRCP 72 ; JCRCP 72A, and therefore writ relief was not warranted. NRS 34.170 ; NRS 34.330 ; Pan v. Dist. Ct., 120 Nev. 222, 224, 88 P.3d 840, 841 (2004). Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

Appellant failed to address in any manner the portion of the district court's order granting respondent's motion to dissolve a temporary restraining order, which was included in the order denying her writ petition, and therefore we do not address it. Mainor v. Nault, 120 Nev. 750, 777, 101 P.3d 308, 326 (2004).

--------


Summaries of

Vo v. CEREF REO II

Supreme Court of Nevada.
Sep 15, 2011
373 P.3d 971 (Nev. 2011)
Case details for

Vo v. CEREF REO II

Case Details

Full title:Tammy VO, Appellant, v. CEREF REO II, a Delaware Limited Liability…

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada.

Date published: Sep 15, 2011

Citations

373 P.3d 971 (Nev. 2011)