From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Violano v. McNamara

Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of New Haven Housing Session
Apr 16, 1998
1998 Ct. Sup. 4860 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1998)

Opinion

No. CVNH 9803-8756

April 16, 1998


MEMORANDUM OF DECISION


It may be, as the plaintiff claims, that the defendant's son committed the acts complained of in November, 1997. However, there is no evidence that the son was the agent of the mother in so doing in November, and the law provides that he is not necessarily his mother's agent. Carrier v. Donovan, 88 Conn. 37, 40, 89 A. 894 (1914). If the plaintiff's personalty was removed in November, 1997, she has not shown that there is probable cause that the defendant removed it. The personalty that was removed on and after December, 1997 was removed after the plaintiff had abandoned or vacated the premises.

The court finds that the plaintiff has not shown that there is probable cause that a judgment will be rendered in her favor. the application for a prejudgment remedy is denied.

BY THE COURT

Bruce L. Levin Judge of the Superior Court


Summaries of

Violano v. McNamara

Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of New Haven Housing Session
Apr 16, 1998
1998 Ct. Sup. 4860 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1998)
Case details for

Violano v. McNamara

Case Details

Full title:DAWN VIOLANO v. IDA McNAMARA

Court:Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of New Haven Housing Session

Date published: Apr 16, 1998

Citations

1998 Ct. Sup. 4860 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1998)