From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vindicator Printing Co. v. Youngstown

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 28, 2004
2004 Ohio 7079 (Ohio 2004)

Opinion

No. 2004-1765.

Decided December 28, 2004.


MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. Upon consideration of relator's motion to consolidate with Supreme Court Case No. 04-448, State ex rel. Plain Dealer Publishing Co. v. Cleveland, and upon determination pursuant to S. Ct. Prac. R. X(5),

IT IS ORDERED by the court that relator's motion to consolidate be, and hereby is, granted for purposes of oral argument and decision.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court sua sponte that an alternative writ be, and hereby is, granted and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S. Ct. Prac. R. X:

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days of the date of this entry; relator shall file its brief within 10 days of the filing of the evidence; respondent shall file its brief within 20 days after the filing of relator's brief; and relator may file a reply brief within 5 days after the filing of respondent's brief.


Summaries of

Vindicator Printing Co. v. Youngstown

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 28, 2004
2004 Ohio 7079 (Ohio 2004)
Case details for

Vindicator Printing Co. v. Youngstown

Case Details

Full title:State ex rel. Vindicator Printing Co. v. Youngstown

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Dec 28, 2004

Citations

2004 Ohio 7079 (Ohio 2004)
104 Ohio St. 3d 1436
819 N.E.2d 1120

Citing Cases

State ex rel. Essi v. City of Lakewood

{¶26} There are peculiar principles to public records mandamus actions. Pursuant to R.C. 149.43, mandamus is…

State ex rel. McElrath v. City of Cleveland

{¶ 16} Pursuant to R.C. 149.43, mandamus is the appropriate remedy to compel compliance with Ohio's Public…