From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Village of Cattaraugus v. Johnson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 1, 1931
233 App. Div. 799 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)

Opinion

May, 1931.

Present — Sears, P.J., Crouch, Taylor, Thompson and Crosby, JJ. [ 139 Misc. 368.]


Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the burden of establishing a violation of the ordinance in cutting a shade tree was upon the plaintiff and whether or not the tree in question was a shade tree within the meaning of the ordinance was a question of fact and we cannot say that the decision of the trial justice in favor of the defendant was contrary to the evidence. All concur.

See Ord. No. 41, effective Feb. 25, 1925. — [REP.


Summaries of

Village of Cattaraugus v. Johnson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 1, 1931
233 App. Div. 799 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)
Case details for

Village of Cattaraugus v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:VILLAGE OF CATTARAUGUS, Appellant, v. FRED E. JOHNSON, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 1, 1931

Citations

233 App. Div. 799 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)