From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Village of Ardsley v. Aetna Casualty and Sur. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 31, 1949
274 App. Div. 1075 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)

Opinion

January 31, 1949.


In an action to reform a certificate of continuance of a surety bond, and a surety bond, and to recover thereon as reformed, order denying, conditionally, appellant's motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to prosecute the action, reversed on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, without costs. There was a delay of approximately three years, and younger issues have been tried. There is no meritorious showing that the delay was not unreasonable. Johnston, Acting P.J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Village of Ardsley v. Aetna Casualty and Sur. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 31, 1949
274 App. Div. 1075 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)
Case details for

Village of Ardsley v. Aetna Casualty and Sur. Co.

Case Details

Full title:VILLAGE OF ARDSLEY, Respondent, v. AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 31, 1949

Citations

274 App. Div. 1075 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)

Citing Cases

Giovannucci v. Brooklyn Richmond Ferry Co., Inc.

Plaintiff failed to explain or excuse the delay of more than four years in bringing the cause on for trial…