Opinion
No. 31959
Decided December 21, 1949.
Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Taxation — One-half of inheritance tax apportioned to one municipality — Decedent's domicile claimed to be in such municipality — Habitual place of abode claimed to be in another municipality — Claim that word, "originates," relates to habitual place of abode and not domicile — Section 9, Article XII, Constitution.
APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton county.
Messrs. Steer, Strauss Adair, for appellant.
Mr. Henry M. Bruestle, city solicitor, and Mr. James W. Farrell, Jr., for appellees.
It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeal dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., MATTHIAS, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART and TURNER, JJ., concur.