From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Video-Cinema Films v. Migdal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 9, 1998
249 A.D.2d 73 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

April 9, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.).


Plaintiff's repeated failure to comply with outstanding discovery demands, and a conditional order of preclusion, justified the drastic relief of dismissal in the absence of a reasonable excuse for the failure to comply, and an affidavit of merits ( see, Video-Cinema Films v. Seaboard Sur. Co., 237 A.D.2d 135; Becerril v. Skate Way Roller Rink, 184 A.D.2d 365). The undated and unsworn letter from a psychiatrist submitted in support of plaintiff's contention that its president was not competent "to prepare for and testify at a trial" did not constitute evidentiary proof in admissible form ( Perez v. New York City Hous. Auth., 229 A.D.2d 310, 311).

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Nardelli, Wallach, Rubin and Mazzarelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Video-Cinema Films v. Migdal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 9, 1998
249 A.D.2d 73 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Video-Cinema Films v. Migdal

Case Details

Full title:VIDEO-CINEMA FILMS, INC., Appellant, v. MIGDAL, POLLACK, ROSENKRANTZ…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 9, 1998

Citations

249 A.D.2d 73 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
671 N.Y.S.2d 239