From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Victor v. Lyon Associates, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 29, 1967
234 N.E.2d 459 (N.Y. 1967)

Opinion

Argued November 29, 1967

Decided December 29, 1967

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, THOMAS C. CHIMERA, J., CHARLES MARKS, J.

Peter J. Malloy, Jr., and Florindo M. DeRosa for appellant.

Herman Schmertz for respondent.

Leon H. Doman and Morton Zuckerman for American Foreign Insurance Association, amicus curiae. James B. Donovan, John P. Walsh and George M. Mulligan, for American Insurance Association, amicus curiae. John C. Kinney, John M. Freyer and Benjamin R. Schenck for American Mutual Insurance Alliance, amicus curiae. Charles G. Pillon for Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, amicus curiae.


In Victor v. Lyon Assoc.: Order affirmed, with costs, upon the opinion of Chief Judge FULD in Simpson v. Loehmann ( 21 N.Y.2d 305, decided herewith). Question certified answered in the affirmative. All concur, Judges KEATING and BREITEL on the grounds stated in their respective concurring opinions in Simpson v. Loehmann, and Judge BERGAN on the grounds stated in the concurring opinion by Judge BREITEL in Simpson v. Loehmann, except Judges BURKE and SCILEPPI who dissent and vote to reverse on the grounds stated in the dissenting opinion in Simpson v. Loehmann.

In Matter of Victor v. Hanover Ins. Co.: The direct appeal is dismissed on the ground that the order appealed from is not final. No opinion. Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, KEATING and BREITEL.


Summaries of

Victor v. Lyon Associates, Inc.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 29, 1967
234 N.E.2d 459 (N.Y. 1967)
Case details for

Victor v. Lyon Associates, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:CARL S. VICTOR, Respondent, v. LYON ASSOCIATES, INC., et al., Defendants…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 29, 1967

Citations

234 N.E.2d 459 (N.Y. 1967)
234 N.E.2d 459
287 N.Y.S.2d 424

Citing Cases

Varady v. Margolis

In his concurring opinion, it is clear that Judge Keating was also concentrating on actions brought by New…

Simpson v. Loehmann

In my dissent in Seider v. Roth ( 17 N.Y.2d 111) I indicated why in my view there was not in that case even…