Summary
explaining remand for failure to mention obesity was not required where claimant did not show how obesity impacted ability to work
Summary of this case from English v. SaulOpinion
Case No. 3:08cv78/MCR/EMT.
March 18, 2009
ORDER
This cause comes on for consideration upon the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated February 6, 2009. (Doc. 23). The parties have been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and have been afforded an opportunity to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). I have made a de novo determination of any timely filed objections.
Having considered the report and recommendation, and any objections thereto timely filed, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.
Accordingly, it is now ORDERED as follows:
1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this order.
2. The decision of the Commissioner is AFFIRMED, this action is DISMISSED, and the clerk is directed to close the file.
DONE AND ORDERED.