From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

VIA v. RAY

United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Roanoke Division
Jun 2, 2011
Civil Action No. 7:11-cv-00138 (W.D. Va. Jun. 2, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 7:11-cv-00138.

June 2, 2011


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


This matter is before the court on plaintiff Barry Lynn Via's motion for interlocutory injunctive relief (Docket No. 5) directing the defendant prison officials to restore the good conduct time he forfeited by refusing a required tuberculosis (TB) test for religious reasons, and directing officials to provide him with an alternative TB test. The court referred the matter to United States Magistrate Judge Michael Urbanski, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), for a Report and Recommendation. The Magistrate Judge subsequently filed a report, finding no basis to grant Via's motion and recommending that the court deny it. Via filed objections within the fourteen days allotted under § 636(b)(1), largely reiterating the arguments made in his pleadings. Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the objections thereto, and pertinent portions of the record de novo in accordance with § 636(b)(1), the court agrees with the Magistrate's Judge's recommendation. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED that Via's objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation are OVERRULED, and that Via's motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunctive relief is DENIED. The court notes, however, that nothing in the court's opinion should be read to indicate that Via's complaint has failed to raise a plausible First Amendment claim regarding the TB testing methods employed by the defendants.

See Canada v. Ray, 2011 WL 565611, at *4 (W.D. Va. Feb. 9, 2011) (finding that while a prisoner may have stated a plausible claim that the TB testing method selected by prison officials violated his rights under RLUIPA and the First Amendment, prison officials were nevertheless entitled to summary judgment because the prisoner had not demonstrated that the TB test actually contained alcohol or any other substances banned by his religion).

The clerk will send a copy of this order to plaintiff and counsel of record for the defendants.


Summaries of

VIA v. RAY

United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Roanoke Division
Jun 2, 2011
Civil Action No. 7:11-cv-00138 (W.D. Va. Jun. 2, 2011)
Case details for

VIA v. RAY

Case Details

Full title:BARRY LYNN VIA, Plaintiff, v. TRACY RAY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Virginia, Roanoke Division

Date published: Jun 2, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 7:11-cv-00138 (W.D. Va. Jun. 2, 2011)