From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vesley v. Cambridge Mutual Fire Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 6, 1983
460 A.2d 1057 (N.J. 1983)

Opinion

Argued May 9, 1983 —

Decided June 6, 1983.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Brian D. Vesley argued the cause for appellant.

Samuel A. Gennet argued the cause for respondent ( Gennet Kallmann, attorneys; Mark L. Antin, on the brief).


The members of the Court being equally divided, the judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed. 189 N.J. Super. 521.

No costs to either party.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WILENTZ and Justices CLIFFORD and O'HERN — 3.

For reversal — Justice HANDLER — 1.

For reversal and remandment — Justices POLLOCK and GARIBALDI — 2.


Summaries of

Vesley v. Cambridge Mutual Fire Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 6, 1983
460 A.2d 1057 (N.J. 1983)
Case details for

Vesley v. Cambridge Mutual Fire Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:DENNIS D. VESLEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CAMBRIDGE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jun 6, 1983

Citations

460 A.2d 1057 (N.J. 1983)
460 A.2d 1057

Citing Cases

Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services

Lichtman v. Bd. of Educ., 93 N.J. 362, 461A 2d 158 (1983). Vesley v. Cambridge Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 93 N.J.…

Committee, Rickel Alternative v. City of Linden

Accordingly, when an appellate court is equally divided it affirms. See Vesley v. Cambridge Mutual Fire Ins.…