From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Verschell v. Pike

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 30, 1978
65 A.D.2d 622 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Opinion

October 30, 1978


In an action, inter alia, to set aside a conveyance, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated May 24, 1978, which granted a motion by plaintiff's former attorney for a protective order. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and motion denied. The attorney-client privilege should be raised by a witness at the time of the examination before trial. Should the examiner improperly seek information regarding privileged matters, a witness may then exercise his right to claim privilege (Matter of Macku, 29 A.D.2d 539). It does not presently appear that any aspect of the prospective examination in the instant case relates to privileged communications. Hopkins, J.P., Martuscello, Gulotta and Shapiro, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Verschell v. Pike

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 30, 1978
65 A.D.2d 622 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)
Case details for

Verschell v. Pike

Case Details

Full title:MAURICE VERSCHELL, Respondent, v. HELENE S. PIKE, Formerly Known as HELENE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 30, 1978

Citations

65 A.D.2d 622 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Citing Cases

Vxi Lux Holdco S.A R.L. v. SIC Holdings, LLC

Here, the defendants should be afforded the opportunity to depose all persons with relevant knowledge of…

Matter of Fiore

The information sought from the nonparty appellant is primarily related to a non-legal business transaction…