From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Venson v. Killina

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
May 5, 2009
Civil Action No. 07-1569 (W.D. Pa. May. 5, 2009)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 07-1569.

May 5, 2009


ORDER


AND NOW, this 5th day of May, 2009, petitioner, William Venson, an inmate at the Otisville Correctional Institution in Otisville, New York, initiated this civil action by filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus by a person in state custody under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On April 15, 2009, Magistrate Judge Amy Reynolds Hay issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and/or as time-barred. Magistrate Judge Hay further recommended that a certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 be denied.

The deadline for filing objections to Magistrate Judge Hay's Report and Recommendation expired on May 4, 2009, and no objections have been filed. Under the circumstances, the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Hay is adopted as the Opinion of the Court, and it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The petition for writ of habeas corpus by a person in state custody filed by William Venson pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and/or as time-barred.

2. A certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253 is denied.

3. In accordance with Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, any party desiring to appeal from this Order must do so within thirty (30) days by filing a Notice of Appeal as provided in Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.


Summaries of

Venson v. Killina

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
May 5, 2009
Civil Action No. 07-1569 (W.D. Pa. May. 5, 2009)
Case details for

Venson v. Killina

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM VENSON, also known as ELTON LEE HOLLY, Petitioner, v. J.M…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: May 5, 2009

Citations

Civil Action No. 07-1569 (W.D. Pa. May. 5, 2009)

Citing Cases

Yelverton v. Gavin

In custody is determined as of the filing date of the habeas petition. See Venson v. Killina, 2009 WL 1228444…

Thomas v. People

Only a plurality of the Supreme Court endorsed the foregoing exceptions. Because the first condition was the…