From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Venner v. Belmont

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1913
158 App. Div. 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 1913)

Opinion

July, 1913.


Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on opinion of Mr. Justice Blackmar at Special Term. Jenks, P.J., Carr, Rich, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

The following is the opinion of the Special Term:


This is not a difficult and extraordinary case within the meaning of the section of the Code authorizing an extra allowance. It is an ordinary action for a libel. The rules of law governing it are simple and elementary. It is true that the defendant has expended large sums of money in investigating the past life of the plaintiff, seeking matter to plead in justification, and has succeeded in discovering enough to enable him to set forth in his answer a biography of the plaintiff stretching over 118 printed pages. The presumption should be that when one publishes libelous matter he already possesses information justifying the charge. The fact that an expensive and elaborate investigation is necessary to secure evidence in justification, while it may indicate that the defense is difficult, does not make the case a difficult one. Motion to discontinue on payment of taxable costs granted. Motion for an extra allowance denied.


Summaries of

Venner v. Belmont

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1913
158 App. Div. 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 1913)
Case details for

Venner v. Belmont

Case Details

Full title:CLARENCE H. VENNER, Respondent, v . AUGUST BELMONT, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 1, 1913

Citations

158 App. Div. 899 (N.Y. App. Div. 1913)

Citing Cases

Schwartz v. Bartle

Obviously, two days spent in trial, using only three witnesses, on the single issue raised in one affirmative…