From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Venegas v. Sniff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 21, 2020
Case No. 5:18-cv-02293-JLS (SHK) (C.D. Cal. May. 21, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 5:18-cv-02293-JLS (SHK)

05-21-2020

SALVADOR VENEGAS Plaintiff, v. STAN SNIFF, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Complaint, the relevant records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge ("R&R"). Plaintiff did not file objections to the R&R. Plaintiff instead filed a "Motion to Clarify Judge's Ruling" and a "Motion for Order of Contempt." Electronic Case Filing Numbers ("ECF Nos.") 45-46. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:

(1) The findings in the R&R are ADOPTED;

(2) Plaintiff's § 1983 official capacity claims against all Individual Defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and without leave to amend;

(3) Plaintiff's access to the courts claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and
(4) Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Sniff, Lewis, Vergara, Leavitt, Taylor, Marshall, McNamara, Wilhite, Benjamin, Folia, Garcia, Gutierrez, Mooney, Johnson, Davalos, Pendleton, Zarillo, Montgomery, Hallam, Garcia, Doshier, Young, and Doe Defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and without leave to amend.

The Court will issue a separate order regarding service of the remaining claims. Dated: May 21, 2020

/s/_________

HONORABLE JOSEPHINE L. STATON

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Venegas v. Sniff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 21, 2020
Case No. 5:18-cv-02293-JLS (SHK) (C.D. Cal. May. 21, 2020)
Case details for

Venegas v. Sniff

Case Details

Full title:SALVADOR VENEGAS Plaintiff, v. STAN SNIFF, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 21, 2020

Citations

Case No. 5:18-cv-02293-JLS (SHK) (C.D. Cal. May. 21, 2020)

Citing Cases

Tennyson v. Cnty. of Sacramento

The official-capacity claims against Sheriff Scott Jones are therefore dismissed with prejudice and without…

Loescher v. Cnty. of Plumas

The court sees no reason to diverge from the principle articulated in these cases. See Venegas v. Sniff, No.…