From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Velasquez v. Brocorp., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 7, 2001
283 A.D.2d 423 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Submitted April 18, 2001.

May 7, 2001.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (J. Leone, J.), dated July 12, 2000, which granted the plaintiff's motion pursuant to CPLR 3126 to strike their answer.

Connors Connors, P.C., Staten Island, N.Y. (John P. Connors, Jr., and Marie E. Cannon of counsel), for appellants.

Before: BRACKEN, P.J., FRIEDMANN, FLORIO, H. MILLER and TOWNES, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiff's motion pursuant to CPLR 3126 to strike the defendants' answer based on the defendants' spoliation of evidence (see, DiDomenico v. C S Aeromatik Supplies, 252 A.D.2d 41; cf., Abenante v. Star Gas Corp., 278 A.D.2d 438).


Summaries of

Velasquez v. Brocorp., Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 7, 2001
283 A.D.2d 423 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Velasquez v. Brocorp., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT D. VELASQUEZ, RESPONDENT, v. BROCORP., INC., ET AL., APPELLANTS

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 7, 2001

Citations

283 A.D.2d 423 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
723 N.Y.S.2d 870

Citing Cases

Laskin v. Friedman

nduct ( see Jenkins v. Proto Prop. Servs., LLC, 54 A.D.3d at 727, 864 N.Y.S.2d 79; Denoyelles v. Gallagher,…

Laskin v. Friedman

Further, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the plaintiff's…