From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Veal v. Paulk

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 18, 1968
159 S.E.2d 304 (Ga. Ct. App. 1968)

Opinion

43349.

ARGUED JANUARY 15, 1968.

DECIDED JANUARY 18, 1968.

Appellate procedure. Ben Hill Superior Court. Before Judge McMurray.

Benjamin Zeesman, for appellant.

Jay, Garden Jay, Clayton Jay, Jr., for appellee.


This is an appeal "from all of the rulings of August 31, 1967 . . . by the trial judge." None of the rulings appealed from is such as will support an appeal under Section 1 of the Appellate Practice Act of 1965 (Ga. L. 1965, p. 18); and since the Act of 1967 (Ga. L. 1967, p. 220), amendatory of the Appellate Practice Act of 1965, Section 1 of which provided for appeal from other judgments not otherwise subject to appeal when the trial judge certifies the importance of immediate review, has been held unconstitutional because of the absence of an enacting clause ( Joiner v. State, 223 Ga. 367 ( 155 S.E.2d 8)), the present appeal must be dismissed.

Appeal dismissed. Jordan, P. J., and Deen, J., concur.

ARGUED JANUARY 15, 1968 — DECIDED JANUARY 18, 1968.


Summaries of

Veal v. Paulk

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Jan 18, 1968
159 S.E.2d 304 (Ga. Ct. App. 1968)
Case details for

Veal v. Paulk

Case Details

Full title:VEAL v. PAULK

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Jan 18, 1968

Citations

159 S.E.2d 304 (Ga. Ct. App. 1968)
117 Ga. App. 109