Opinion
Submitted January 3, 2000
February 17, 2000
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), dated March 3, 1999, as granted that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of liability.
Barron, McDonald, Carroll and Cohen, New York, N.Y. (Williamson Williamson [Anthony Van Zwaren ] of counsel), for appellants.
GUY JAMES MANGANO, P.J., LAWRENCE J. BRACKEN, DANIEL W. JOY, HOWARD MILLER, JJ.
DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, with costs, and that branch of the motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of liability is denied.
The Supreme Court erred in granting that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of liability. Res ipsa loquitur is a rule of evidence, which merely provides a permissible inference of negligence, rather than a presumption (see, Dermatossian v. New York City Tr. Auth., 67 N.Y.2d 219, 226;Feuer v. HASC Summer Program, 247 A.D.2d 429; Davis v. Federated Dept. Stores, 227 A.D.2d 514). Thus, application of the doctrine as a basis for awarding summary judgment is inappropriate (see, Feuer v. HASC Summer Program, supra; Davis v. Federated Dept. Stores, supra; Shinshine Corp. v. Kinney Sys., 173 A.D.2d 293, 294; Veltri v. Stahl, 155 A.D.2d 287, 288).