From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vauls v. Veterans Administration

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Nov 19, 1982
693 F.2d 232 (D.C. Cir. 1982)

Opinion

No. 82-1054.

Submitted November 4, 1982.

Decided November 19, 1982.

James R. Rosa and Mitchell J. Notis, Washington, D.C., on brief for petitioner.

Stanley S. Harris, U.S. Atty., and Royce C. Lamberth, R. Craig Lawrence, Michael J. Ryan, and Regina C. McGranery, Asst. U.S. Attys., Washington, D.C., on brief for respondent. Alan F. Greenwald and Evangeline W. Swift, Attys., Merit Systems Protection Bd., Washington, D.C., entered appearances for respondent.

Petition for Review of an Order of the Merit Systems Protection Board.

Before WRIGHT, WILKEY, and WALD, Circuit Judges.

Opinion for the court per curiam.


We conclude, in agreement with the decisions in Hayes v. United States Government Printing Office, 684 F.2d 137 (D.C. Cir. 1982), Chang v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 677 F.2d 173 (1st Cir. 1982), Christo v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 667 F.2d 882 (10th Cir. 1981), and Wiggins v. United States Postal Service, 653 F.2d 219 (5th Cir. 1981), that mixed cases involving claims of both discrimination and improper agency action must be brought as one action in the District Court Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction over the petitioner, and it is therefore dismissed.

So ordered.


Summaries of

Vauls v. Veterans Administration

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
Nov 19, 1982
693 F.2d 232 (D.C. Cir. 1982)
Case details for

Vauls v. Veterans Administration

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD R. VAULS, PETITIONER, v. VETERANS ADMINISTRATION, MERIT SYSTEMS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit

Date published: Nov 19, 1982

Citations

693 F.2d 232 (D.C. Cir. 1982)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Department of Army

[2] Chang v. MSPB, 677 F.2d 173 (1st Cir. 1982); Christo v. MSPB, 667 F.2d 882 (10th Cir. 1981), mandate…

Dobbins v. Tennessee Valley Authority

Whether the case is a mixed case, appealable to a District Court, or not a mixed case, appealable to the…