From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vatter v. Kaltenbach

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 1, 1926
131 A. 900 (N.J. 1926)

Opinion

Argued November 2, 1925 —

Decided February 1, 1926.

For the appellant, Joseph T. Hague and Spaulding Frazer.

For the respondents, Stamler, Stamler Koestler.


These are appeals from judgments of the Supreme Court, overruling demurrers to alternative writs of mandamus and awarding peremptory writs.

The same questions are raised as in Lutz et al. v. Kaltenbach, post, p. 718, of the present term of this court, and the conclusions reached therein are applicable and controlling herein.

The judgments below are affirmed, with costs.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, CAMPBELL, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Vatter v. Kaltenbach

Court of Errors and Appeals
Feb 1, 1926
131 A. 900 (N.J. 1926)
Case details for

Vatter v. Kaltenbach

Case Details

Full title:JOHANNA VATTER, RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM T. KALTENBACH, SUPERINTENDENT OF…

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Feb 1, 1926

Citations

131 A. 900 (N.J. 1926)
131 A. 900

Citing Cases

Wyatt v. Metropolitan Maintenance Company

Very early in the history of the act, our courts held that accidental injuries during such breaks would be…