From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vassos v. Societa Trans-Oceanica Canopus

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nov 19, 1959
272 F.2d 182 (2d Cir. 1959)

Opinion

No. 39, Docket 24812.

Submitted November 6, 1959.

Decided November 19, 1959.

Jacob Rassner, New York City, for libelant-appellant.

Victor S. Cichanowicz, of Giallorenzi Cichanowicz, New York City, for respondents-appellees.

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and HINCKS and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges.


Libelant, an alien seaman, seeks redress for personal injuries allegedly sustained on May 15, 1949, while aboard the S.S. Canopus, a vessel of Panamanian registry. In a reasoned opinion, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 143 F. Supp. 945, Judge Bicks sustained exceptions to the libel because of a previous decision in 1954 by Judge Edelstein in a civil action between the parties as well as in the exercise of independent discretion to decline to accept jurisdiction in this suit between aliens.

Judge Edelstein's dismissal of the civil action was based both upon the statute of limitations and upon a refusal to accept jurisdiction. No appeal was taken from it. Citing N.Y.Civil Practice Act, § 23, appellant tries here to reopen the question of jurisdiction and assert a new theory of liability. But the claim is now completely res judicata on jurisdictional as well as substantive issues. Stoll v. Gottlieb, 305 U.S. 165, 170, 172, 59 S.Ct. 134, 83 L.Ed. 104; Angel v. Bullington, 330 U.S. 183, 190, 67 S.Ct. 657, 91 L.Ed. 832; Koziol v. The Fylgia, 2 Cir., 230 F.2d 651, certiorari denied 352 U.S. 827, 77 S.Ct. 40, 1 L.Ed.2d 49. And any attempt to reopen a judgment in a civil action is completely controlled by F.R.Civ.P. 60(b), not by state statute.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Vassos v. Societa Trans-Oceanica Canopus

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nov 19, 1959
272 F.2d 182 (2d Cir. 1959)
Case details for

Vassos v. Societa Trans-Oceanica Canopus

Case Details

Full title:Christos VASSOS, Libelant-Appellant, v. SOCIETA TRANS-OCEANICA CANOPUS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Nov 19, 1959

Citations

272 F.2d 182 (2d Cir. 1959)

Citing Cases

Still v. Townsend

This procedural question under Rule 60(b)(2) is controlled by federal law rather than by state law. Thomas v.…

Kinnear Corp. v. Crawford Door Sales Co.

When a motion is made under that rule to vacate a default judgment in federal court, state court decisions do…