From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vanterpool v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 15, 2014
12-CV-8789 (VEC)(SN) (S.D.N.Y. May. 15, 2014)

Summary

holding that the ALJ was not required to contact the physician for further information or clarification when the record was complete

Summary of this case from Edwards v. Berryhill

Opinion

12-CV-8789 (VEC)(SN)

05-15-2014

EPHRAIM VANTERPOOL, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

:

On due consideration, after review of Magistrate Judge Netburn's Report and Recommendation dated April 22, 2014, no party having objected, the time for objecting having expired, and no clear error appearing on the face of the record, the Report and Recommendation is approved and adopted.

The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment accordingly and to terminate the case.

SO ORDERED.

Date: May 15, 2014

New York, NY

/s/ _________

VALERIE CAPRONI

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Vanterpool v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
May 15, 2014
12-CV-8789 (VEC)(SN) (S.D.N.Y. May. 15, 2014)

holding that the ALJ was not required to contact the physician for further information or clarification when the record was complete

Summary of this case from Edwards v. Berryhill

holding that the ALJ was not required to contact the physician for further information or clarification when the record was complete

Summary of this case from Prince v. Berryhill

holding that the ALJ was not required to contact the physician for further information or clarification when the record was complete

Summary of this case from Prince v. Berryhill

holding that mere inconsistency in the record did not require an ALJ to re-contact the treating physician for clarification, where there was no obvious gap in the record

Summary of this case from Burke v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

holding that mere inconsistency in the record did not require an ALJ to re-contact the treating physician for clarification, where there was no obvious gap in the record

Summary of this case from Gabrielsen v. Colvin

finding the ALJ did not err in affording greater weight to the opinion of the consultative physician where the opinion was more consistent with the treating physician's medical records

Summary of this case from Fiorante v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

finding the ALJ did not err in affording greater weight to the opinion of the consultative physician where the opinion was more consistent with the treating physician's medical records

Summary of this case from Bates v. Berryhill

finding the ALJ did not err in affording greater weight to the opinion of the consultative physician where the opinion was more consistent with the treating physician's medical records

Summary of this case from Williams v. Colvin

finding the ALJ did not err in affording greater weight to the opinion of the consultative physician where the opinion was more consistent with the treating physician's medical records

Summary of this case from Pilaccio v. Comm'r of the Soc. Sec. Admin.

finding that ALJ did not have a responsibility to further develop the record where there were discrepancies between the reports and contemporaneous records of the plaintiff's treating physician

Summary of this case from Kaczkowski v. Colvin

finding that ALJ did not have a responsibility to further develop the record where there were discrepancies between the reports and contemporaneous records of the plaintiff's treating physician

Summary of this case from Evans v. Commissioner of Soc. Sec.
Case details for

Vanterpool v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:EPHRAIM VANTERPOOL, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: May 15, 2014

Citations

12-CV-8789 (VEC)(SN) (S.D.N.Y. May. 15, 2014)

Citing Cases

Williams v. Colvin

See, e.g., Smith v. Colvin, 17 F.Supp.3d 260, 268 (W.D.N.Y.2014) ("[T]he opinions of consulting sources 'may…

Villafane v. Colvin

The Court notes that the Fifth Edition of the DSM has discarded the use of GAF Scores. The DSM IV, however,…