From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vansant v. Ocean Dunes Condo. Council Inc.

COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
Feb 26, 2014
Civil Action No. 8700-VCG (Del. Ch. Feb. 26, 2014)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 8700-VCG

02-26-2014

Re: Vansant v. Ocean Dunes Condominium Council Inc.

James Deakyne Cynthia Beam Law Office of Cynthia G. Beam Christiana Executive Campus


SAM GLASSCOCK III
VICE CHANCELLOR
James Deakyne Cynthia Beam
Law Office of Cynthia G. Beam
Christiana Executive Campus
Dear Counsel:

This Letter Opinion addresses the Plaintiffs' Motion to Expedite in way of a hearing on preliminary injunctive relief. In order to demonstrate entitlement to expedited relief, a plaintiff need only show a colorable claim; a threat of imminent, irreparable harm; and that the harm threatened justifies the expense of expedition.

This matter involves disputed rights to the use of an easement or right of way in Rehoboth Beach. The Plaintiffs claim a right to use the entire fifty feet width of the right of way in question: the Defendants claim an exclusive easement over twenty feet of the right of way for purposes of parking. The Plaintiffs have met the very low standard for demonstrating a colorable claim. Moreover, interference with a property right constitutes irreparable harm. However, the irreparable harm threatened is slight, since the Plaintiffs still have the ability to access their properties across the right of way. Acknowledging this, the Plaintiffs suggest irreparable harm is threatened since the paved portion of the roadway is eleven feet wide and will not allow emergency vehicles to pass other vehicular traffic in the right of way. This, however, would be the case regardless of the Defendants' use of the easement. After examining the affidavits submitted by the parties, it appears that two vehicles may pass one another in the right of way regardless of the Plaintiffs' use of the easement, although one would, of necessity, have to yield the pavement. Accordingly, I do not find the irreparable harm threatened sufficient to justify expedition. However, I anticipate that a limited record will be sufficient to take this matter to a swift hearing on the Plaintiffs' request for a permanent injunction. To the extent the foregoing requires an Order to take effect, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sincerely,

Sam Glasscock III


Summaries of

Vansant v. Ocean Dunes Condo. Council Inc.

COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
Feb 26, 2014
Civil Action No. 8700-VCG (Del. Ch. Feb. 26, 2014)
Case details for

Vansant v. Ocean Dunes Condo. Council Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Re: Vansant v. Ocean Dunes Condominium Council Inc.

Court:COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

Date published: Feb 26, 2014

Citations

Civil Action No. 8700-VCG (Del. Ch. Feb. 26, 2014)

Citing Cases

Yeilding v. Council of Ass'n of Unit Owners of Pelican Cove Condo.

OB 15. See, e.g., Vansant v. Ocean Dunes Condo. Council Inc., 2014 WL 718058, at *1 (Del. Ch. Feb. 26, 2014);…

Kuhns v. Bruce A. Hiler Del. QPRT

However, because an injunction is only proper when the balance of equities favors the movant, I must…