From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vandesande v. Miami-Dade Cnty.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb 15, 2017
211 So. 3d 1086 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

No. 3D15–2038

02-15-2017

Steven VANDESANDE, Appellant, v. MIAMI–DADE COUNTY, Appellee.

Steven Vandesande, in proper person. Abigail Price–Williams, Miami–Dade County Attorney, and William X. Candela, Assistant County Attorney, for appellee.


Steven Vandesande, in proper person.

Abigail Price–Williams, Miami–Dade County Attorney, and William X. Candela, Assistant County Attorney, for appellee.

Before SUAREZ, C.J. and SALTER and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court's entry of summary judgment on Count I of Appellant Steven Vandesande's Third Amended Complaint. Peeples v. Peeples , 871 So.2d 945 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (barring former husband's supplemental petition on the basis of res judicata).

We also affirm the trial court's directed verdict on the remaining counts of Vandesande's Third Amended Complaint. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee , 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979) (holding that "[w]ithout a record of the trial proceedings, the appellate court can not properly resolve the underlying factual issues so as to conclude that the trial court's judgment is not supported by the evidence or by an alternative theory.").

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Vandesande v. Miami-Dade Cnty.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Feb 15, 2017
211 So. 3d 1086 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)
Case details for

Vandesande v. Miami-Dade Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:Steven VANDESANDE, Appellant, v. MIAMI–DADE COUNTY, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Feb 15, 2017

Citations

211 So. 3d 1086 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2017)