From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vanderpool v. Sharp

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Mar 15, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-5082 (WJM) (D.N.J. Mar. 15, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10-5082 (WJM).

March 15, 2011


ORDER (CLOSED)


For the reasons expressed in the Court's Opinion filed herewith,

It is on this 15th day of March, 2011,

ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), the application submitted by Plaintiff to proceed in forma pauperis is hereby GRANTED; and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to file the Complaint without prepayment of the filing fee; and it is further

ORDERED that the Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, in its entirety as against all named defendants, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii), for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted at this time; and it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff may move to re-open his case and amend his Complaint to cure the deficiencies as noted in the accompanying Opinion filed herewith.


Summaries of

Vanderpool v. Sharp

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Mar 15, 2011
Civil Action No. 10-5082 (WJM) (D.N.J. Mar. 15, 2011)
Case details for

Vanderpool v. Sharp

Case Details

Full title:MICKEY LEE VANDERPOOL, Plaintiff, v. KENNETH SHARP, et al. Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Mar 15, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 10-5082 (WJM) (D.N.J. Mar. 15, 2011)

Citing Cases

Grohs v. Yatauro

I note that there have been (unreported) cases in this district finding no cognizable conditions of…