From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vandelli v. Vandelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 8, 1999
266 A.D.2d 280 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Submitted September 30, 1999

November 8, 1999

Elisabeth Vandelli, East Northport, N.Y., appellant pro se.

DANIEL W. JOY, J.P., GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, LEO F. McGINITY, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated August 21, 1990, the defendant former wife appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Leis, J.), dated July 31, 1998, as denied her motion to vacate the judgment.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant's motion to vacate the judgment of divorce on the ground of newly-discovered evidence (see, CPLR 5015 [a] [2]; S.A.B. Enters. v. Stewart's Ice Cream Co., 242 A.D.2d 845 ). The so-called newly-discovered evidence was in existence before the judgment of divorce was issued and the defendant failed to establish that she could not have discovered it sooner with due diligence (see, Corpuel v. Galasso, 240 A.D.2d 531 ; McGovern v. Getz, 193 A.D.2d 655 ; Vierya v. Briggs Stratton Corp., 166 A.D.2d 645 ).

JOY, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, McGINITY, and FEUERSTEIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Vandelli v. Vandelli

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 8, 1999
266 A.D.2d 280 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Vandelli v. Vandelli

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT FRANCIS VANDELLI, respondent, v. ELISABETH VANDELLI, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 8, 1999

Citations

266 A.D.2d 280 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
698 N.Y.S.2d 506

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Croft, v. Gordon

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The Family Court providently exercised…

Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Walsh

The first certified question should be answered in the affirmative under the facts of this case. (…