From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vanadio v. Good Samaritan Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 21, 1981
85 A.D.2d 662 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Opinion

December 21, 1981


In a medical malpractice action, the defendant hospital appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Stolarik, J.), dated May 6, 1981, which granted plaintiff's motion for discovery and inspection. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. The plaintiff may obtain from defendant hospital the names and addresses of patients who shared decedent's hospital room during the time he was allegedly left unattended although suffering from a severe heart condition which ultimately led to his demise. Disclosure of the identity of a nonparty patient who may be a witness to alleged acts of malpractice does not violate the privilege of confidentiality of treatment accorded individuals within the purview of CPLR 4504 (subd [a]) or section 2803-c (subd 3, par f) of the Public Health Law (see King v O'Connor, 103 Misc.2d 607; McMahon v Hayes-73rd Corp., 197 Misc. 318). Mollen, P.J., Hopkins, Titone, Weinstein and Bracken, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Vanadio v. Good Samaritan Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 21, 1981
85 A.D.2d 662 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)
Case details for

Vanadio v. Good Samaritan Hospital

Case Details

Full title:ANNE VANADIO, as Executrix of ALEXANDER VANADIO, Deceased, Respondent, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 21, 1981

Citations

85 A.D.2d 662 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Citing Cases

Rogers v. Nyu. Hosps. Ctr.

Disclosure, however, was permitted in Hirsch v Catholic Med. Ctr. (91 AD2d 1033, 1034 [2d Dept 1983])…

Rogers v. NYU Hospitals Center

( Id. [emphasis added].) Disclosure, however, was permitted in Hirsch v. Catholic Med. Ctr. ( 91 AD2d 1033,…