From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Van Valkenburgh v. Lutz

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 29, 1952
107 N.E.2d 82 (N.Y. 1952)

Opinion

Submitted May 19, 1952

Decided May 29, 1952


Motion for reargument denied. Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and when returned it will be amended to read as follows: Judgments reversed, counterclaim dismissed and judgment directed to be entered in favor of plaintiff, Joseph D. Van Valkenburgh, for the relief prayed for in the complaint subject to the existing easement. ( Lutz v. Van Valkenburgh, 274 App. Div. 813), with costs in all courts.


Summaries of

Van Valkenburgh v. Lutz

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 29, 1952
107 N.E.2d 82 (N.Y. 1952)
Case details for

Van Valkenburgh v. Lutz

Case Details

Full title:MARION L. VAN VALKENBURGH, Plaintiff, and JOSEPH D. VAN VALKENBURGH…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 29, 1952

Citations

107 N.E.2d 82 (N.Y. 1952)
107 N.E.2d 82

Citing Cases

Van Valkenburgh v. Lutz

LEWIS, CONWAY and FROESSEL, JJ., concur with DYE, J.; FULD, J., dissents in opinion in which LOUGHRAN, Ch.…