From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Van Sickell, et al. v. Margolis

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mar 2, 1970
262 A.2d 203 (N.J. 1970)

Opinion

Argued February 17, 1970 —

Decided March 2, 1970.

On appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. Raymond C. Connell argued the cause for appellant ( Messrs. Connell Andresakes, attorneys).

Mr. Adolph A. Romei argued the cause for respondents ( Messrs. Romei Bernstein, attorneys).


The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion per curiam in the Appellate Division, 109 N.J. Super. 14.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Van Sickell, et al. v. Margolis

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Mar 2, 1970
262 A.2d 203 (N.J. 1970)
Case details for

Van Sickell, et al. v. Margolis

Case Details

Full title:ELIZABETH VAN SICKELL, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. ABE MARGOLIS…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Mar 2, 1970

Citations

262 A.2d 203 (N.J. 1970)
262 A.2d 203

Citing Cases

Shankman v. State

We have held as much. Van Sickell v. Margolis, 109 N.J.Super. 14, 18, 262 A.2d 209 (App.Div.), aff'd o.b., 55…