From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Van Metre v. Van Metre

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 3, 1989
551 So. 2d 593 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Summary

concluding that an order requiring the former husband to pay the former wife's reasonable and necessary medical expenses that were not covered by insurance improperly imposed open-ended and unlimited financial liability and was unenforceable

Summary of this case from Granell v. Granell

Opinion

No. 89-00903.

November 3, 1989.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Manatee County, Paul E. Logan, J.

Lucinda Meekins Stathis, Bradenton, for appellant.

Judith Susan Van Metre, pro se.


Appellant/husband raises four issues in his challenge of a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. We find merit only in appellant's argument that the trial court erred when it ordered him to "pay all reasonable and necessary medical expenses incurred by the Wife which are not covered by insurance obtained through her employer." Such an open-ended and unlimited financial liability is unenforceable. Holtan v. Holtan, 528 So.2d 79 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); Angle v. Angle, 506 So.2d 16 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987), rev. denied, 513 So.2d 1060 (Fla. 1987).

We therefore reverse that portion of the final judgment. The judgment is otherwise affirmed. On remand, the trial court may require appellant to maintain medical insurance on behalf of wife and reserve jurisdiction to review future requests for other reasonable and necessary medical expenses not covered by insurance.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded.

CAMPBELL, C.J., and DANAHY and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Van Metre v. Van Metre

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 3, 1989
551 So. 2d 593 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

concluding that an order requiring the former husband to pay the former wife's reasonable and necessary medical expenses that were not covered by insurance improperly imposed open-ended and unlimited financial liability and was unenforceable

Summary of this case from Granell v. Granell

In Van Metre v. Van Metre, 551 So.2d 593 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989), the trial court erred when it ordered the husband to "pay all reasonable and necessary medical expenses incurred by the wife which are not covered by insurance obtained by her employer.

Summary of this case from Loss v. Loss
Case details for

Van Metre v. Van Metre

Case Details

Full title:JAMES CLINTON VAN METRE, APPELLANT, v. JUDITH SUSAN VAN METRE, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Nov 3, 1989

Citations

551 So. 2d 593 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

Loss v. Loss

But even if the court had limited the expenses to those which are reasonable and necessary, it would still be…

Marsh v. Marsh

This is reversible error. See Szemborski v. Szemborski, 530 So.2d 361 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Jones v. Jones,…