From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Van Horn v. Maguire

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Mar 3, 1964
328 F.2d 585 (5th Cir. 1964)

Summary

In Van Horn v. Maguire, 5 Cir., 328 F.2d 585, 586, which involved the same issue, the Court stated: "This appeal from denial of habeas corpus borders on the frivolous."

Summary of this case from Hodge v. Markley

Opinion

No. 20953.

March 3, 1964.

James H. Walsh, Samuel S. Jacobson, Asst. U.S. Attys., Jacksonville, Fla., Edward F. Boardman, U.S. Atty., Middle Dist. of Florida, for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and JONES and BELL, Circuit Judges.


This appeal from denial of habeas corpus borders on the frivolous. There is no substance in appellant's contention that a parole violator is entitled to credit on his original sentence for time spent on parole and while serving a state sentence. Johnson v. Wilkinson, 5 Cir., 279 F.2d 683.

The judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Van Horn v. Maguire

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Mar 3, 1964
328 F.2d 585 (5th Cir. 1964)

In Van Horn v. Maguire, 5 Cir., 328 F.2d 585, 586, which involved the same issue, the Court stated: "This appeal from denial of habeas corpus borders on the frivolous."

Summary of this case from Hodge v. Markley
Case details for

Van Horn v. Maguire

Case Details

Full title:Roy Francis VAN HORN, Appellant, v. John E. MAGUIRE, United States…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Mar 3, 1964

Citations

328 F.2d 585 (5th Cir. 1964)

Citing Cases

Young v. Director, U.S. Bureau of Prisons

296 F.2d 730 (3d Cir. 1961), wherein it is stated that a prisoner is not entitled to credit upon his sentence…

Smith v. Attorney General of the United States

He also contends that he should be given credit against his sentence for the time spent in prison on the…