From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Van Dyke v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 9, 1933
63 F.2d 1020 (9th Cir. 1933)

Opinion

Nos. 6949, 6950.

March 9, 1933.

Petitions to Review Orders of the United States Board of Tax Appeals.

William E. Brooks, of Miami, Ariz., and R.A. Bartlett, of New York City, for petitioners.

G.A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sewall Key and Hayner N. Larson, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen. (C.M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, and Thomas R. Callahan, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D.C., of counsel), for respondent.

Before WILBUR, SAWTELLE, and MACK, Circuit Judges.



Upon consideration of the records, briefs, and oral argument of respondent, ordered order of Board of Tax Appeals in each of above causes affirmed upon the authority of Burnet v. Clark, 287 U.S. ___, 53 S. Ct. 207, 77 L. Ed. ___, and Dalton v. Bowers, 287 U.S. ___, 53 S. Ct. 205, 77 L. Ed. ___, both decided December 12, 1932.


Summaries of

Van Dyke v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Mar 9, 1933
63 F.2d 1020 (9th Cir. 1933)
Case details for

Van Dyke v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:Ida A. VAN DYKE, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE…

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 9, 1933

Citations

63 F.2d 1020 (9th Cir. 1933)

Citing Cases

State ex Rel. Hausgen v. Allen

In its strict and primary sense the term "municipal corporation" applies only to incorporated cities, towns,…